Language

Comparative Benchmarks

To illustrate the AutoFEM Analysis performance, we show several comparative benchmarks comparing the solving time and peak memory consumption of AutoFEM, Ansys and SolidWorks Simulation.
Parameters of the computer system:
Processor - Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
Random Memory - 8 Gb
, DDR2 333 MHz

The best result in the tables is marked with green colour.

 

 

Linear Static Analysis

AutoFEM Analysis

Ansys WorkBench

SolidWorks Simulation

Linear Static Analysis, iterative solving method

CAE System

Number of elements

Number of equations

Solving time, s

Peak Memory Usage, MB
AutoFEM Analysis 402,227 1,689,282 81 2,070
Ansys WorkBench 399,329 1,648,450 169 1,600
SolidWorks Simulation 406,836 1,749,819 79 950

Linear Static Analysis, direct solving method

CAE System

Number of elements

Number of equations

Solving time, s

Peak Memory Usage, MB
AutoFEM Analysis 44,621 209,499 17 1,211
Ansys WorkBench 44,627 233,421 33 1,620
SolidWorks Simulation 44,487 204,150 46 1,220

Frequency Analysis

AutoFEM Analysis

Ansys WorkBench

SolidWorks Simulation

Frequency Analysis, iterative solving method, 5 modes

CAE System

Number of elements

Number of equations

Solving time, s

Peak Memory Usage, MB
AutoFEM Analysis 42,983 199,314 39 430
Ansys WorkBench 41,410 216,573 57 1,773
SolidWorks Simulation 42,679

195,750

58 116

Frequency Analysis, direct solving method, 5 modes

CAE System

Number of elements

Number of equations

Solving time, s

Peak Memory Usage, MB
AutoFEM Analysis 44,621 209,499 43 1,210
Ansys WorkBench 44,627 233,421 39 1,772
SolidWorks Simulation 44,487 204,150 46 1,009

Buckling Analysis

AutoFEM Analysis

Ansys WorkBench

SolidWorks Simulation

Buckling Analysis, iterative solving method, 5 modes

CAE System

Number of elements

Number of equations

Solving time, s

Peak Memory Usage, MB
AutoFEM Analysis 170,267 1,005,393 207 2,018
Ansys WorkBench 171,521 978,597 n/a out of memory
SolidWorks Simulation 172,744

948,666

250 3,192

Buckling Analysis, direct solving method, 5 modes

CAE System

Number of elements

Number of equations

Solving time, s

Peak Memory Usage, MB
AutoFEM Analysis 33,994 204,414 26 811
Ansys WorkBench 33,808 205,500 57 1,920
SolidWorks Simulation 33,565 209,838 42 1,009

Conclusion.
AutoFEM Analysis provides the calculation performance of the same level as other famous CAE systems.

AutoFEM and other CAE systems comparison
( AutoFEM vs Ansys & SolidWorks Simulation )

We are often asked, "Does AutoFEM provide an acceptable precision of calculations? Is there any comparison AutoFEM and other famous finite element software systems?"
Below you can find a comparison of our tutorial examples, solved, besides AutoFEM, in two other well known finite element systems: ANSYS Workbench and SolidWorks Simulation (CosmosWorks).

Linear Static Strength Analysis

The result "Displacements" in AutoFEM Analysis:
The result "Displacements" in AutoFEM Analysis

The result "Displacements" in SolidWorks Simulation:
The result "Displacements" in SolidWorks Simulation

The result "Displacements" in Ansys Workbench:
The result "Displacements" in Ansys Workbench

Comparison:

AutoFEM
Ansys
CosmosWorks
Max Displacements, mm 0,06497 0.06424 0.06406
Number of tetrahedra 9,924 10,797 10,601

Conclusion:
We can see, the maximal displacements are very close in spite of the difference between finite element meshes.

The result "Stresses von Mises" in AutoFEM Analysis:
The result "Stresses von Mises" in AutoFEM Analysis

The result "Stresses von Mises" in SolidWorks Simulation:
The result "Stresses von Mises" in SolidWorks Simulation:

The result "Stresses von Mises" in Ansys Workbench:
The result "Stresses von Mises" in Ansys Workbench

Comparison:


AutoFEM
Ansys
CosmosWorks
Max Stresses, MPa 67,96 81,336 99,387
Number of tetrahedra 1,281 840 1,105

Conclusion:
We can see fairly large disturbance in stress estimations between all FEA systems because of the
finite element mesh coarseness.

Frequency Analysis (determining resonance frequencies)

First mode, AutoFEM Analysis:
First mode, AutoFEM Analysis

First mode, Ansys WorkBench:
First mode, Ansys WorkBench

First mode, SolidWorks Simulation:
First mode, SolidWorks Simulation

Fifth mode, AutoFEM Analysis:
Fifth mode, AutoFEM Analysis

Fifth mode, Ansys WorkBench:
Fifth mode, Ansys WorkBench

Fifth mode, SolidWorks Simulation:
Fifth mode, SolidWorks Simulation

Comparison:


AutoFEM
Ansys
CosmosWorks
First frequency, Hz
441.92
440.13
438.84
Fifth frequency, Hz 2,853,14 2,843.6 2,840.3
Number of tetrahedra 1,281 870
1,105

Conclusion:
We can see that frequencies and shapes of modes are very close in all systems.

Buckling Analysis (critical load factor)

First buckling mode, AutoFEM Analysis:
First buckling mode, AutoFEM Analysis

First buckling mode, Ansys WorkBench:
First buckling mode, Ansys WorkBench

First buckling mode, SolidWorks Simulation:
First buckling mode, SolidWorks Simulation

Third buckling mode, AutoFEM Analysis:
Third buckling mode, AutoFEM Analysis

Third buckling mode, Ansys WorkBench:
Third buckling mode, Ansys WorkBench

Third buckling mode, SolidWorks Simulation:
Third buckling mode, SolidWorks Simulation

Comparison:


AutoFEM
Ansys
CosmosWorks
First Load Factor
8.676
8.5485
8.4937
Third Load Factor 16.002 15.931 15.861
Number of tetrahedra 3,209 2.871
3,103

Conclusion:
We can see that all critical-load factors and buckling shapes are very close in all systems.

Thermal Analysis

Temperature field, AutoFEM Analysis:
Temperature field, AutoFEM Analysis

Temperature field, Ansys WorkBench:
Temperature field, Ansys WorkBench

Temperature field, SolidWorks Simulation:
Temperature field, SolidWorks Simulation

Thermal Flux, AutoFEM Analysis:
Thermal Flux, AutoFEM Analysis

Thermal Flux, Ansys WorkBench:
Thermal Flux, Ansys WorkBench

Thermal Flux, SolidWorks Simulation
:Thermal Flux, SolidWorks Simulation

Comparison:


AutoFEM
Ansys
CosmosWorks
Maximum Temperature, C
38.9824
39.088
38.996
Maximum Heat Flux, W/m2
14,960 19,969 15,770
Number of tetrahedra 8,710 20.776
3,103

Conclusion: Temperatures and thermal (heat) fluxes are close in all systems.

AutoFEM Analysis Processor

The AutoFEM Analysis Processor is the main engine and brain of the system. Its function is the generation and solving systems of algebraic equations which are derived from the finite element discretization. The AutoFEM Analysis Processor has all necessary possibilities for solving linear and non linear equation systems. It uses as direct methods as well iterative methods. When necessary (in case of big systems or weak computer systems), the mode of using the disk storage turns on.

Window of settings for the static analysis solver

Window of settings for the static analysis solver.

Stages of solving equations and additional background information are displayed in a special information window, which indicates parameters of the finite element mesh (the number of nodes and elements), the method of solving the system of equations (direct or iterative), the order of iteration for non linear system solving, error messages and etc.

AutoFEM Processor window of the system messages

AutoFEM Processor window of the system messages.

Upon completion of calculations, a folder containing its results is created in the tree of the study in AutoFEM Palette window. These results are available for view and analysis by means of the AutoFEM Analysis Postprocessor.

AutoFEM Community

Small and medium companies and educational institutions as well - all select AutoFEM Analysis for finite element modelling.

Most of our users mark the following benefits:

- easiness of use and learning;

- very attractive prices for perpetual licence;

- integration with AutoCAD and ShipConstructor software.

 



                             

 

Testimonials

Borys Sukhanyuk, structural and calculations engineer of Skipskompetance

"I like your program very much. Interface is very nice, logic and very easy to understand and use. All operations are intuitive and easy to perform. Extremly short training time.
I am using AutoFem mostly for check of ShipConstructor structures as well as analysis of solid models where capabilities of beam analysis programs are insufficient.
Analysis can be set up quick and easy."

Volker Junicke, Logistikberatung Dipl.-Ing. (FH)
"Ich bin sehr zufrieden mit der Software. Man muss sich aber Zeit dafür nehmen, um ein gutes Ergebnis zu erzielen und oft viele Experimente durchführen, bis man ein brauchbares Netz erstellt hat."

"I am very satisfied with the software. Though, one must take time to achieve a good result and often perform many experiments until you have created a usable network."

AutoFEM Analysis Postprocessor

At the last stage of the finite element modelling there is a review and analysis of results. Within the framework of AutoFEM Analysis Postprocessor the available results are displayed in the "Palette of Studies" (folder "Results"). The user can change the list of results he/she needs to display by using the "Results" command in the contextual menu.

Customizing the results.

It is possible to open several windows for some of the different results.

Opening the result window.

Visualization of the results can be flexibly configured using the option dialog in the Postprocessor window. The user can set colors, the scale of the deformed model grid, boundary conditions, loop models, etc. Adjusting the colour scale is needed if you want get a more expressive representation of results.

Options dialog of postprocessor window

Options dialog of postprocessor window.

The user has vast possibilities of setting up display numeric values. You can use several predefined types of color scales, and also have the unique opportunity of flexible adjustment of the scale of any color filling. There is opportunity to establish user-defined minimums, maximums and flexible font settings.

Setting window of the color scale

Setting window of the color scale.

Often it is needed to analyze the results obtained within the 3D model. To do this, use the command “Section”, which allows you to create a sliced model with the desired angle and view the results.

Cross section on stress diagram

Cross section on stress diagram.

AutoFEM Analysis Postprocessor has an unique opportunity of a dynamic view of the numerical results by means of moving the mouse over the surface of the deformed finite element model, i.e., sensing. There is also command “Extreme Labels” which shows the points with the maximum and minimum of the resulting value.

Using the extreme and floating labels for indicating the result's value

Using the extreme and floating labels for indicating the result's value.

The user can create .avi file with the animated result. This movie can be send to the customer to illustrate the result of the finite-element analysis or to be used for better understanding of physical phenomena and for educational purposes, too. It is possible to create a "Report", which is independent of AutoFEM Analysis electronic document and containing basic information about the study. The report is generated in html-format; viewing is possible in any browser, for example, MS Internet Explorer.

Creating a report in html format

Creating a report in html format.

Thus, AutoFEM Analysis has a vast potential of analyzing the results of the finite element analysis and of their representation for customers; also it might be used in the production sector of economy.

You can see it yourself using

AutoFEM Analysis Lite -  free software for finite element analysis